Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Every State, Ranked by How Miserable Its Winters Are

Every State, Ranked by How Miserable Its Winters Are


Updated On 01/03/2017 at 09:57AM EST


Thrillist Winter Misery Index



How can you remain so upbeat when you get all the winter weather patterns? Alberta clippers? Sure. Panhandle hooks? You betcha! Parts of northern Minnesota see up to 170in of snow in a winter. One hundred seventy inches! That’s like two and a half times the height of Kent Hrbek!! It can get down to -60 degrees, a temperature at which frostbite can occur in fewer than five minutes. There are no chinook winds or moderating oceans to temper things outside of a small area by Lake Superior. Your sports teams never win championships. All of your good high school hockey players end up starring for NHL teams in other cities. Ice fishing can’t be that cool, really.
And so we think that -- despite all appearances -- Minnesota does in fact have the most miserable winter in the United States. So to all the Eriks, and Astrids, and Christens, and Bjorns, and Brynjars, it’s OK to show a little displeasure at the clusterfuck of a meteorological hand you’ve been dealt. After all, don'tcha know emoting is good for the system?

Massive Arctic Ice Gain Over The Past Five Years

Massive Arctic Ice Gain Over The Past Five Years 



Massive Arctic Ice Gain Over The Past Five Years

Arctic sea ice extent is up 40% from this date five years ago.





Greenland’s surface gained ten times as much ice as it did five years ago, and was the fifth highest on record.





Greenland’s most famous glacier, the Petermann Glacier, has grown substantially and steadily over the past five years.





This is a big change from 1939, when the glaciers of Greenland and Norway were facing catastrophic collapse.





NASA responded quite predictably to the inconvenient 1930’s warmth in the Eastern Arctic – by simply trying to erase it.


It is also a big change from 65 years ago, when the glaciers of
Norway and Alaska had lost half their mass, and threatened to drown
seaports.





Climate scientists have responded to this years large Arctic ice gain
by doing the only thing they know how to do – lie about it.

Monday, September 18, 2017

Colorado’s electricity rates continue to rise

Colorado’s electricity rates continue to rise



Colorado’s electricity rates continue to rise

  • September 16, 2017
  • Amy Cooke
Colorado’s electricity rates continue to rise
By Grant Mandigora


Executive Summary


In 2001, Colorado electricity consumers enjoyed some of the lowest
electric rates in the country. The 15 years since haven’t been so kind
to ratepayers. For more than a decade, elected officials, PUC
commissioners, industry and advocates have told Colorado ratepayers that
they could transform the state’s electricity generation away from coal
and toward industrial wind, solar and natural gas with little cost to
ratepayers. However, the actual numbers tell a much different story.


  • Colorado electricity rates have risen sharply – 62.1 percent –
    across residential, commercial and industrial sectors, despite a slight
    decrease in recent years.
  • Colorado electricity rates have increased 17.2 percentage points
    more than the Mountain state region (Arizona, Idaho, Montana, New
    Mexico, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming) collectively, where rates increased
    44.9 percent over the same time period.
  • The 62.1 percent increase is 1.75 times more than the cumulative rate of inflation at 35.4 percent.
  • The rise in electricity rates has outpaced the rise in household
    income which has averaged a meager four percent over the last 10 years.
  • Public policy may be to blame in part. Colorado Public Utilities
    Commission (PUC) data suggests that in 2012, part of the dramatic
    increase was due to the renewable energy mandate.
Introduction


Since 2001, Centennial state ratepayers have been forced to endure a
62.1 percent electricity rate hike across all sectors. What happened in
those 15 years?


The New Energy Economy (NEE),
ushered in by one-term Democrat Governor Bill Ritter (2007-2010) and
advanced by current Democrat Governor John Hickenlooper, is a spate of
nearly 57 laws that transformed how the state generates and delivers
power. Included in the NEE are mandates and programs such as 30 percent
renewable energy standard, tripling of the original 10 percent mandate
passed by voters in 2004;  mandated fuel switching from coal to natural
gas titled the “Clean Air, Clean Jobs Act,” and Demand-side management, where customers pay monopoly utilities not to produce electricity.


Following up on a March 2016
paper from then senior energy policy analyst Michael Sandoval, our
current analysis shows a slight decline in recent years but still an
overall trend of skyrocketing rates. We looked at each sector over the
last 15 years and compared Colorado to other Mountain states and the impact on ratepayers.


Rising Electricity Rates


Data analysis shows that electricity rates across all sectors
(residential, commercial, and industrial) increased by an average of
62.1 percent between 2001 and 2016. For context, the average increase
across all sectors for all Mountain states during the same period was
44.9 percent. The increase nationally was 41.1 percent. Colorado saw
increases that were 17.2 and 21 percentage points higher than the
mountain states and the United States respectively.





Colorado’s residential rates haven’t fared much better, increasing
60.9 percent over the last 15 years. While this increase isn’t the
highest among Mountain states, it is nearly 11 percentage points higher
than the collective 50 percent increase over the same time period, and
14.9 points higher than the U.S. average of 46 percent.





The rise in Colorado’s commercial
electricity rates (usually defined as a smaller manufacturer or
activity that produces a service) was an alarming 70.3 percent over the
last 15 years. While the average across Mountain states was 46.4 percent
and the U.S. average was 30.9 percent. Colorado’s increase is 23.6
percent more than its region and more than double the U.S. average.





Colorado’s industrial
rates (saved for larger industrial and commercial users) tell a similar
tale having increased by 59.1 percent over the last 15 years. The
Mountain state average during this same period has been 30 percent with
the U.S. average approximately 33 percent. Again, Colorado’s rates have
far outpaced the U.S. and Mountain state average considerably. As
Colorado rates have risen, some states have seen a decline in particular
Montana and Nevada rates have dropped by 25 and 11 percent
respectively.





Across all sectors there was a marginal decrease in the cost of
electricity between 2014 and 2016 of 0.30 cents per kilowatt hour or
approximately 9 percent. This coincides with a decrease in the energy price index of 10.1 percent, which typically results in lower fuel costs for utilities and a lower cost of living for consumers.
A key factor in the decrease of the energy price index was the price of
natural gas as the Institute for Energy Research reported:


Between 2005 and October of 2015… natural gas prices delivered to electric utilities declined by almost 60 percent and coal prices have remained essentially flat. 
Still, that decrease didn’t come close to narrowing the gap between
the rise in Colorado electricity rates and median household income. In
2005 Colorado’s household
median income was $61,474, by 2015 this amount was only $63,909, an
increase of only 4 percent. This disparity between income and the cost
of electricity is shown more clearly in the graph below.





During this same time, U.S. cumulative inflation
rate was 35.4 percent. That means the cost of powering Coloradans’
homes and the state’s economy has increased 1.75 times (nearly double)
the rate of inflation as the graph below illustrates.  That electricity
prices have risen is no surprise, that the price has risen by 57 percent
more than inflation is surprising.





The Why


We know from previous research that Colorado’s electric generation capacity is plentiful, in fact, Colorado has excess generation.  With excess supply, what are rates low? The simple answer is public policy.


Governor Bill Ritter assured Coloradans that tripling the renewable mandate wouldn’t increase costs to consumers. Yet the Institute for Energy Research (IER) notes:


 Colorado has higher electricity rates than most of
its neighboring states: Colorado jumped from middle of the pack to
second highest residential electricity prices in the Mountain West since
the RPS was implemented. Additionally, Colorado Public Utilities
Commission data show that the RPS was directly responsible for a 13
percent increase in Colorado’s electricity rates in 2012.
Additionally, IER in their study  ‘The escalating cost of electricity’ explain the impact of regulations and mandates on Colorado rates:


Over the past 10 years, electricity prices have been
going up, while over most of that time, the costs of coal and natural
gas—the two major fuel inputs to electric generation—have declined or
stayed relatively flat. This anomaly is caused by the growth of more
expensive renewable energy (wind and solar power) and the onerous
regulations that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is forcing on
electric utilities that require capital investments to be made to
existing generators. This trend has occurred at both the national level
and in states like Colorado, and has happened when U.S. electricity
consumption 
has stayed relatively flat or even declined.


Impact on consumers


According to the American Coalition for  Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) “In the U.S., energy costs eat between 5 and 22 percent of families’ total after-tax income, with the poorest Americans, or 25 million households, paying the highest of that range.”  


Those in Quintile one (Q1) i.e. the poorest households on average
spend 22 percent of their after-tax income on energy. The study found
that increases in the cost of electricity disproportionately affect
those in Q1. Their energy needs are generally inflexible therefore any
increase in the cost of electricity means they must reduce spending in
other basic necessities such as food and clothing.





In contrast, the U.S. average for household expenditure on energy is
seven percent of after tax income. It is fair to say that the
electricity price increases in Colorado have taken money from
ratepayer’s pockets. ACCCE goes as far as saying these increases “…serve as an effective tax on households.


Even Xcel acknowledges the challenge of high electricity rates on low income Coloradans and provides payment options for them.


Xcel, the state’s largest electricity utility, calculates monthly payments based on 3 percent of a household’s income.


Average households pay 2 percent to 3 percent for energy,
compared with low-income households, which often pay as much as 50
percent.



‘That leaves very little for food, clothing, medicine,’ said Pat Boland, Xcel’s manager of customer policy and assistance.
Bottom line, Colorado’s public policy that has driven up electricity rates hurts the least among us.


Conclusion


Governor Ritter and other renewable energy advocates said the NEE in
Colorado wouldn’t cost ratepayers more. A 62.1 percent electricity
increase, over the last fifteen years, across all sectors, shows just
how wrong they were. Over the same period, the price of  natural gas has dropped an astonishing 79.3 percent, while the price of coal
rose marginally by 0.6 percent. Ratepayers have not benefitted from the
drop in prices and instead have had to contend with rising electricity
prices.


The rise in prices has hurt low income families disproportionately,
with most of their income being redirected from basic necessities to
paying for power. At the same time, household median incomes across the
state have barely risen. The legislative mandates imposed by the NEE
have played a major role in the rise in prices. This begs the question,
would Coloradans have supported the NEE had they known the cost upfront?


What is clear: ratepayers are the biggest losers when prices increase so drastically while incomes remain static.

ALERT: If You See THIS On Your Receipt From Walmart- Call The Police IMMEDIATELY

ALERT: If You See THIS On Your Receipt From Walmart- Call The Police IMMEDIATELY



ALERT: If You See THIS On Your Receipt From Walmart- Call The Police IMMEDIATELY


If you shop at Walmart then you will definitely want to see
this. Apparently, Walmart has been ripping people off by charging them
for an item that doesn’t even exist! 






Sharon Bufford went
to Walmart the other day and when she got home she notice that there
was an item on her receipt that made no sense at all. 
She took to Facebook to explain her situation and to warn others about this scam.


Here is her post in it’s entirety:
“I shopped at Walmart in Clinton today. I was charged $10 for absolutely nothing.





The item is JAJKET 000000000001K.


I called them when I got home and was told that this is a phantom item. It randomly comes up even though it is not scanned.


When I asked how long it has been happening, I was told almost 10
years. They know about this. It randomly gets added to your ticket and
unless you are checking or paying attention then you pay for it without
getting anything for it.


Going tomorrow to get a refund. This is ridiculous! They know it happens, but haven’t told anyone.


Told me they can’t purge it from their system. When I wondered how
many times this has happened to me before they seemed to not care.


How many times has it happened to others?


I sent an email to corporate office. Hope somebody fixes this!


If I took $10 merchandise and said it was a phantom, I bet I would be seeing the inside of a jail cell!


Watch your receipts! It supposedly comes up same letters and numbers every time.”


Here is her receipt- I have highlighted the item, code  and price in question. 





Here are a few responses from pissed off Walmart shoppers!


You know I’ve got every receipt from Walmart I should check mine they owe me some money that is so unfair


The “k” at the end means it was hand keyed by the cashier not an error. That cashier is ripping customers off!!!!


That why I don’t go to walmart


The cashier is taking the cash otherwise the register would be over.


Ooo. I’d be definitely giving. Piece of my mind


The cashier is skimming the till.


This darn well ticks me off!!! Should tick everyone off!!!!! Going to go over every ticket from now on!!


I think that would be the thing to do is to fix the problem because you can’t never trust anybody anymore not these days


Contributions go directly to Clinton Found -ation


It has happened more than twice with me
but i am still at store and makevthem check what i bought for the price
they charged me and i make them pay me back



I’m sure someone will blame it on trump lol


It’s the RUSSIANS!!!


That’s why I won’t shop there!!!!! How much money have they made over 10 years…….MILLIONS!!!!!!!!
You get the idea.


My advice is to check your receipts and don’t shop at that crappy store.

EXPOSED: Hillary Clinton Moved 800K From Her Campaign To Help Fund ANTIFA


EXPOSED: Hillary Clinton Moved 800K From Her Campaign To Help Fund ANTIFA



EXPOSED: Hillary Clinton Moved 800K From Her Campaign To Help Fund ANTIFA




Hillary, who long during the campaign trail condemned “dark-money”
Super-PACs, has funneled over 800K from her Campaign over to one of
these very same outfits. It has been revealed that the failed
presidential candidate’s Super-PAC, “Onward Together”, is heavily
backing “resistance” and Alt-Left extremist groups such as ANTIFA.


In building investigations, Daily Caller first discovered that Hillary transferred a mass sum of money from her campaign over to Onward Together:


Clinton transferred $800,000
from her failed 2016 presidential campaign to Onward Together shortly
before announcing the group’s launch in May, documents the campaign
filed with the FEC reveal.
Now, today, it has been revealed by Offended America exactly where that money is going:


Daily Caller reached
out to five different Antifa linked groups, and only one was willing to
deny donations from Onward Together. Soros-linked group, Indivisible,
denied receiving financial support from Clinton or Onward Together.


“Onward Together has not given any financial support to us,” Helen Kalla, an Indivisible spokesperson, wrote to Daily Caller.


Kalla added that Clinton’s group has “been amplifying and
highlighting our work through their digital networks,” which she
explained has consisted of “retweeting [Indivisible], and they’ve
highlighted our work via their emails to their list too.”


According to Federal Election Commission documents, Hillary Clinton
transferred $800,000 from her failed political campaign “Hillary for
America” to her new Super-PAC “Onward Together”, before she announced
the existence of the PAC in May, 2017.


Amid other disturbing details, it’s now been revealed that “Onward
Together” is a 501(c)4 “Social Welfare” organization, which means that
it’s not required to disclose many of the details of its operations to
the public or disclose who its donors are.


By receiving campaign funds, and then furnishing the funds to Antifa
terrorist groups, Clinton may have implicated many of her supported in a
crime.


Hillary Clinton, now too old to run for office, will go back to doing
what she’s always done best, round up money from anonymous sources, and
then use that money to influence elections and pedal power.

Saturday, September 16, 2017

North Korea Threatens To Sink Japan With A Nuke

North Korea Threatens To Sink Japan With A Nuke


nuke-war2
North Korea has not only threatened to turn the United States into “ashes and darkness,” but they’ve also threatened neighboring Japan. They have said that they would like to sink Japan with a nuke for the newly imposed United Nations sanctions on the regime.
“Japan is no longer needed to exist near us,” the state-run Korean Central News Agency said on Thursday, citing a statement by the Korea Asia-Pacific Peace Committee. “The four islands of the archipelago should be sunken into the sea by the nuclear bomb of Juche,” it said, a reference to the regime’s ideology of self-reliance. Juche is the North’s ruling ideology that mixes Marxism and an extreme form of forced nationalism preached by state founder Kim Il-sung, the grandfather of the current leader, Kim Jong-un.
Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary, Yoshihide Suga, called the comments, “extremely provocative.” Suga continued saying, “If North Korea stays the course that it is on, it will increasingly become isolated from the world. Through implementing the new United Nations Security Council resolution and related agreements, the international community as a whole needs to maximize pressure on North Korea so that it will change its policy,” Suga told reporters on Thursday in Tokyo.
The most recent United Nations sanctions on North Korea came shortly after the regime tested their sixth and most powerful nuclear weapon earlier this month. “A telling blow should be dealt to them who have not yet come to senses after the launch of our ICBM over the Japanese archipelago,” a spokesman for the Korea Asia-Pacific Peace Committee said in a previous statement. The committee is an affiliate of Kim Jong-un’s ruling Workers’ Party.
The remarks about Japan came sandwiched between threats against the U.S. and South Korea. “Now is the time to annihilate the U.S. imperialist aggressors,” the statement on KCNA said. “Let’s vent our spite with mobilization of all retaliation means which have been prepared till now.” The North had also said that South Korean “puppet forces are traitors and dogs of the U.S. as they call for harsher ‘sanctions’ on the fellow countrymen, adding that the “group of pro-American traitors should be severely punished and wiped out with fire attack so that they could no longer survive.
As we approach what appears to be an imminent war with North Korea, the rhetoric will continue to get more threatening and vile.

Thursday, September 14, 2017

Communism's Barbaric Cruelty By the Numbers

Communism's Barbaric Cruelty By the Numbers 









Communism's Barbaric Cruelty By the Numbers

Communism's death toll overshadows other contemporary human cruelty.


 
 





Writing in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, A. Barton Hinkle remembers "A century of ghastly communist sadism,"
which started when a relatively small number of Bolshevik anarchists
led by Vladimir Lenin managed to overthrow the Russian government of
Alexander Kerensky in November 1917. As Hinkle writes, "while the Soviet
Union is no more and communism has been discredited in most eyes for
many years, it is hard even now to grasp the sheer scale of agony
imposed by the brutal ideology of collectivism."


The Black Book of Communism,
which came out in 1997, estimated that some 95 million people were
either killed or made to starve to death in the communist attempt to
create an egalitarian paradise on earth. Current research
puts the number of victims of communism anywhere between 43 million and
162 million. As such, the original 100 million figure remains a
remarkably accurate midway point. It is, also, a figure so large that
people may have difficulty comprehending it without additional context.
Leaving the (rightly) well-known example of the Holocaust aside, let us
look at some other bywords for human cruelty.


For example, the Russian Empire was always seen as backward and tyrannical. As Orlando Figes noted in A People's Tragedy: The Russian Revolution: 1891-1924,
"from the perspective of the individual, it could be said that the
single greatest difference between Russia and the West... was that in
Western Europe citizens were generally free to do as they pleased so
long as their activities had not been specifically prohibited by the
state, while the people of Russia were not free to do anything unless
the state had given them specific permission to do it. No subject of the
Tsar, regardless of his rank or class, could sleep securely in his bed
in the knowledge that his house would not be subject to a search, or he
himself to arrest."





So, how bad was the backward and tyrannical Tsarist regime that was
so reviled by its more sophisticated Western neighbors? Between 1825
and 1917, Stéphane Courtois notes in his introduction to The Black Book of Communism,
"tsarism carried out 6,321 political executions (most of them during
the revolution of 1905-1907), whereas in two months of official 'Red
Terror' in the fall of 1918 Bolshevism achieved some 15,000." That's one
way to put communism in perspective.


Or take another byword for savagery—the Inquisition. According to
Professor Agostino Borromeo, a historian of Catholicism at the Sapienza
University in Rome who authored a 783-page study
of the Inquisition that was based on the Church's own records, "there
were some 125,000 trials of suspected heretics in Spain... [between 1478
and 1834, but only] about 1 percent of the defendants (i.e., 1,250)
were executed." The rate of killing varied across Europe. Of the 13,000
people tried by the inquisition in Portugal (1536-1821), 5.7 percent
(i.e., 741) were executed.


Queen Mary, the eldest daughter of Henry VIII, who has come to be
known as Bloody Mary for her attempt to restore Catholicism to England
between 1553 and 1558, sent 280 dissenters to the stake. If we consider
the communist era as the period between the birth of the Soviet Union in
November 1917 and its dissolution in December 1991, the ideology
killed, on average, 154 people every hour.


Lastly, consider apartheid, which the United Nations declared
a "crime against humanity" in 1966. The Truth and Reconciliation
Commission, which was tasked by Nelson Mandela's government to provide a
definitive account of apartheid abuses between 1960 and 1994, found (Volume 5, p. 232)
that the "IFP (Inkatha Freedom Party—a black nationalist movement)
remains the major perpetrator of killings on a national scale, being
allegedly responsible for over 4,500 killings compared to 2,700
attributed to the SAP (white-dominated South African Police) and 1,300
to the ANC (African National Congress—another black nationalist
movement)."


Personally, I find the above figures astonishingly low, but was
unable to come up with other numbers from an equally authoritative
source. (Also, keep in mind that the data does not include killings
committed by the South African Defense Force). In any case, the
inclusion of the SAP killings allows me to make one final comparison
between communism and other murderous regimes of the last century.


As one of the pre-eminent historians of South African history, Hermann Giliomee writes in his 2012 book The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power,
in 1984, which was one of the most violent years during the struggle
against apartheid, South Africa only had 1.4 policemen per 1,000 of
population. A comparable figure in the United Kingdom was 2.4, 4.4 in
Ulster and 5.7 in Algeria. In the USSR the number was 16 per 1,000.


Put in proper perspective, in other words, communism really does take
the cake when it comes to the scale and intensity of human rights
abuses.


FLASHBACK: Bernie Sanders Says Medicaid-For-All Would Bankrupt America

FLASHBACK: Bernie Sanders Says Medicaid-For-All Would Bankrupt America



FLASHBACK: Bernie Sanders Says Medicaid-For-All Would Bankrupt America

FLASHBACK

Ah, 1987. Bon Jovi saw a million faces and rocked them all with Slippery When Wet. A young Rick Moranis made us laugh in Spaceballs. And Bernie Sanders said that a medicaid-for-all type plan would…wait, would bankrupt the country?

bon jovi

That’s right. While Bernie Sanders has Democrats signing a suicide pact by supporting single payer health care (see Elizabeth Warren Tag Teams Bernie Sanders in Senile Healthcare Bill and California Senate Flips Bird to Taxpayers. Passes Single-Payer Healthcare Bill), he apparently had a better grasp of math in the 80s.

When
Sanders was mayor of Burlington, he filmed a show called “Bernie Speaks
with the Community.” During one 1987 episode about the American health
care system, he said that giving everyone Medicaid for all would be too
much of a financial burden for the United States to bear.

“One of
the points that we understand and I think was reinforced when we went to
Canada,” Sanders told Dr. Miltion Terris, “Number one, you want to
guarantee that all people have access to healthcare as you do in
Canada.”

Sanders continued, doubting that America’s system could handle such a change.

“But
I think what we understand is that unless we change the funding system
and the control mechanism in this country to do that,” he said. “For
example, if we expanded Medicaid [to] everybody. Give everybody a
Medicaid card – we would be spending such an astronomical sum of money
that, you know, we would bankrupt the nation.”
Talk about bad medicine.

bon jovi

(You knew the jokes you were getting before you clicked this)

To
be fair though, he was talking about “Medicaid” for all when what he’s
pushing now is “Medicare” for all, so that’s like comparing apples to…a
different kind of apple. Wait no, apples are delicious. It’s more like
comparing dog poop to cat poop. Different? Yes. But still poop.

If
anything, I guess America’s budget is greater now than 30+ years ago.
But so also is our debt. So I dunno, maybe people should pay for their
own selves and government can stay the hell out. These are just ideas,
obviously. Wouldn’t want government to get carried away and allow
Americans to mind their own beeswax. How scandalous.

Apparently Bernie understood economics before he completely forgot about economics.